Learner Reviews & Feedback for Fundamentals of Quantitative Modeling by University of Pennsylvania
About the Course
Top reviews
RB
Nov 9, 2022
This course was very much on the point and used real Models to demonstrate the study material, Professor keeps the pace optimum so that beginners are comfortable, I highly recommend this course.
NM
Jul 22, 2017
Very good background to quantitative modelling. It gets a bit heavy on the mathematical formulas in places, but if you follow through, it helps cement understanding. Good speed/pace of material.
1701 - 1725 of 1,740 Reviews for Fundamentals of Quantitative Modeling
By Nadine F
•May 2, 2020
I love this subject, but the way it was taught here was extremely boring and hard to follow/focus. I took it this class at NYU for grad school (higher level), so I was just looking to refresh and almost died.
By Michael S
•Mar 24, 2016
Really superficial overview, I suppose it's good for just familiarizing oneself with assigning the appropriate model, but to shallow for any real carry over to the real world.
By Davide B
•May 10, 2016
It is very easy and somehow less impacting on real business problem. I hope this Microdegree will get into some kind of complexity otherwise will remain high school level.
By Savannah B
•Jul 1, 2018
If you have taken a statistics course in the past, this course is not super useful besides understanding which models are used for specific business problems.
By ROHAN J
•May 27, 2023
A very fundamental course that could have been taught in bits with Excel modelling directly. Not for someone who even knows a little about regression.
By Leah M
•Mar 31, 2018
Explanations not clear. Difficult to follow equations in slides (variables and equations are not repeated from slide to slide).
By Abhishek G
•Jan 30, 2017
Personally, did not like the pace of the course. The course can be a bit more interesting with real-life case studies.
By Rahul g
•May 6, 2022
The course was overall okay but it was boring at the same time, seems like instructor was reading slides only.
By Vaishnav G
•Jul 28, 2022
I found the course to be very elementary and very introductory, although well structured and well taught
By Andrey V
•Dec 31, 2016
Just the basics. No concrete explanations of models. You have to study them on your own.
By Deleted A
•Apr 27, 2016
Very basic and the lectures are short in duration. Not what I expected from this course.
By Mohammed A O A
•Jan 27, 2020
Too difficult for a beginner, lecture fails to reach to the main point directly
By Tasneem N E
•Nov 2, 2020
Professor didn't communicate the material in a way that was easy to understand
By Kia A
•Jun 29, 2022
Too theoretical, without much opportunity to practice and test knowledge
By Onanong C
•Apr 22, 2021
Bad quality of voice. On point is very loud and one point is too quiet
By Alia s
•Apr 27, 2020
at some point it was a little bit complicated for me
By Panagiotis
•Oct 25, 2016
A first year undergraduate student can pass this
By Andrea
•Jun 28, 2020
Really theoretical and not detailed
By David L
•Jul 8, 2025
Too simple, just high school stuff
By Preet M
•Oct 5, 2024
very confusing not well explained
By Okoli U
•May 8, 2025
This wasn’t beginner friendly
By Huihui C
•May 3, 2024
Really basic
By Zaynab T
•Jul 13, 2024
very basics
By Rob B
•May 12, 2016
I do not intend this to be mean, but I could not listen to Richard Waterman. I am British and I understand that Richard was born in the UK but spent a great many years in the US. If he had a BritiI really struggled to listen to him as his accent crosses the Atlantic several times a sentence. I found I couldn't listen to WHAT he was saying because I was so distracted by HOW he was saying it. I am sorry, there is probably nothing that he can do about it and the course looked very interesting but I simply could not bring myself to continue.
By iana s
•Aug 18, 2025
CSV files have inconsistent dates: The files have different time periods and in some cases contain invalid date entries, such as "6/30/1501"