Learner Reviews & Feedback for Supply Chain Logistics by Rutgers the State University of New Jersey
About the Course
Top reviews
MM
Aug 16, 2023
I'm well pleased to be granted the support to study this course, and this has really motivated me to go for more, because the knowledge acquired overtime can be implemented in real life situations.
PM
Dec 2, 2020
I had an issue with the marking scheme as I always submit my assignment very early and because of the 3 needed reviews I am being told that my assignment is overdue. This is very frustrating.
2401 - 2425 of 2,952 Reviews for Supply Chain Logistics
By TEJA S D
•Mar 16, 2020
good
By Kumar S
•Mar 11, 2020
Very
By Liz
•Feb 10, 2020
good
By TOTA V R
•Feb 3, 2020
good
By Harshit S
•Jan 16, 2020
good
By Prashant R
•Jan 11, 2020
Nice
By raghul b
•Aug 11, 2019
mass
By leon b
•Jul 7, 2019
good
By Shobhit M
•Dec 19, 2018
Nice
By Anh T N
•Dec 11, 2018
good
By Se J O
•Jul 29, 2018
good
By Alejandra S
•May 30, 2017
good
By Andrew1224
•Oct 1, 2016
good
By Emtenan
•May 14, 2022
..
By Walaa A A
•Nov 18, 2021
...
By Challa B
•Jul 8, 2024
NA
By Rajesh c
•Oct 27, 2022
.
By Efe C
•Jul 16, 2025
.
By Farid
•May 18, 2025
W
By Shareef P
•Jun 30, 2024
.
By Ahsan M
•Apr 1, 2023
.
By Prashant P
•Nov 29, 2022
.
By Briana B
•Jun 26, 2022
By Bruce S
•Dec 10, 2017
V
By Alexander D
•Sep 13, 2024
A really great course for the beginner level with a perfect mixture of video lectures with a human touch, reading and practical assignments. Rudolf did an outstanding job and I enjoyed every part of it. Very clear explanations and examples, a bunch of humor and quite a lot of content covered, despite a rather short overall timing. It could be perfect, if not for a couple of issues. The course needs an update - some of the referenced resources are no longer available. Old data does not look good. AI-based tools should be mentioned, at least. And there is also no AI-detection in the assignments. Not sure, if the latter is not a Coursera-wide issue, though, which degrades the value of the certificates. Something needs to be done to improve the peer-reviewing mechanism in general. But, overall, a very good impression. Please, update and upgrade.